Bring detailed engineering studies into your Creo design work. Investigate the behavior that matters, compare a considered change and keep the assumptions behind the result in view.
Creo Ansys Simulation brings Ansys-powered structural, thermal and modal analysis into the Creo environment. It supports detailed investigation as a design moves toward refinement and validation, while Creo Ansys Simulation Advanced adds capabilities for more demanding behavior.
Start with a decision the model needs to support: a mounting interface, an operating temperature or a vibration concern. Define the materials, loads, supports and contacts that represent that question. A useful study connects those assumptions to a result the responsible engineer can explain.
Watch PTC’s 1:24 overview of the Advanced extension, including combined physics, contact and material behavior. Source recording published in 2023; use the current proposal and documentation to confirm availability.
Examine where stress concentrates and how far a part deflects under a defined load. For a mounting bracket, compare two rib designs under the same load and supports to see which better meets a deflection limit.
How does the load enter the part, and where is it restrained?
Estimate the temperature distribution once the system reaches steady operation. For an electronics enclosure, model the heat from components and how it leaves through the housing to compare which areas run hottest.
Which heat sources and transfer conditions represent operation?
Find the frequencies at which an assembly naturally vibrates and see how it moves in each mode. Compare the natural frequencies with excitation frequencies from a motor or fan to identify possible resonance and decide whether a follow-up vibration study is needed.
Which supports, masses and operating excitations matter?
Review study types, boundary conditions, meshing, results and Advanced-only capabilities. This six-page reference carries a 2024 copyright.
Download product datasheetThe value of a study comes from the decision it improves. Set a purpose for the analysis, compare the relevant alternatives and decide what evidence is needed before the next commitment.
Investigate a design concern before it becomes a late change. Bring the person who will review the result into the study definition so the output answers a useful question.
Use a digital study to focus the next physical trial or design iteration. Keep the cost of model preparation and the need for appropriate physical verification in the discussion.
Compare a proposed change against a defined requirement. Record the acceptance criteria and the study assumptions so a favorable-looking contour is connected to a meaningful engineering review.
Explore alternatives while the design can still change. Compare like-for-like study conditions and document the tradeoff each candidate introduces, rather than selecting a concept from one result alone.
Look beyond a single peak value. Examine the load path, sensitivity to assumptions and behavior across relevant conditions to understand why the model responds as it does.
Simulation can support earlier insight and better-targeted decisions. It does not guarantee a saving, a compliant product or an acceptable result without an appropriate model and review.
Choose around the question and the depth of evidence required. Interactive concept feedback and a detailed refinement study serve different moments in development; an existing simulation environment also has its own methods and responsibilities.
| Your design question | Consider | Prepare to discuss |
|---|---|---|
| What changes as I explore the shape? | Creo Simulation LiveInteractive design guidance while modeling. | The response you want to compare, supported study types and the equipment required for the proposed environment. Explore simulation capabilities |
| How does this developed design behave? | Creo Ansys SimulationAnsys-powered structural, thermal and modal refinement studies. | A representative geometry revision, material data, boundary conditions, contact assumptions and review criteria. Review the product scope |
| Does nonlinear or coupled behavior matter? | Creo Ansys Simulation AdvancedAdditional nonlinear contact/material and combined structural–thermal capabilities. | The mechanism that requires added analysis depth and the product/version entitlement for that study. See the Advanced overview |
| How does this fit our existing analysis practice? | Creo Simulation extensionsA separate family of simulation offerings. | Existing models, methods and specialist requirements; compare supported capabilities rather than assuming the products are interchangeable. Explore Creo Simulation |
This is a starting-point guide, not an entitlement matrix. Confirm the selected release, platform, package, extensions and supported physics for the proposed environment.
The ten-page guide compares Creo Ansys Simulation, its Advanced offering, Creo Simulation Extension and Creo Advanced Simulation Extension. It is a high-fidelity comparison; the interactive Simulation Live workflow is discussed separately here.
Download comparison guideCompare early design guidance with the detail needed for a later study.
Give the team a clear reason to move between fast design feedback and a more detailed study. Carry the engineering question forward, then deliberately review the setup before using a different analysis method.
Use the appropriate interactive guidance to understand how a proposed geometry change affects the response you are investigating. Keep alternatives identifiable and note which assumptions were held constant.
Carry forward: the candidate geometry and the question it needs to answer.
Prepare the detailed model, mesh, contacts and operating conditions for the selected simulation tool. Check that the setup still represents the intended scenario, then interpret the result against the agreed criteria.
Carry forward: the reviewed study, its assumptions and the resulting design decision.
PTC documents associativity with Creo Simulation Live setup for Creo Ansys Simulation. Confirm the supported handoff and review the transferred definitions, materials, loads and contacts; do not assume that different methods produce identical results.
Use the eight-page portfolio brochure to place Ansys-powered refinement studies within the wider simulation workflow. Bring your representative task to the tool-selection discussion.
Download simulation brochureReview other specialist analysis questions in their own context.
These illustrative applications help frame a representative study around your product, operating scenario and review responsibilities.
Scroll or swipe to explore all 5 industries. Use Tab to reach each industry link.
Investigate a representative component under the program’s defined loading or vibration conditions. Keep configuration, evidence and approval responsibilities with the analysis; this example implies no certification outcome. Ansys-powered studies in context What evidence will the program reviewer need from the study?
Vehicle programs coordinate components across packaging, supplier and manufacturing constraints. Use this setting as a practical example when reviewing structural and thermal behavior with high-fidelity analysis. Which product interface and review criteria should guide the evaluation?
Frame a mounting, support or thermal-growth question around an equipment assembly. Review the operating scenario and interfaces with the people who will judge whether the study represents the machine. Ansys-powered studies in context Which interface or operating condition should the team investigate?
Discuss an enclosure, support or temperature-related mechanical question around the equipment being developed. Agree the thermal environment and structural interfaces before selecting a study. Ansys-powered studies in context Which temperature or mechanical interface could influence the design?
Device teams work within defined design controls and documented review responsibilities. Use this setting as a practical example when reviewing structural and thermal behavior with high-fidelity analysis. Which product interface and review criteria should guide the evaluation?
Resolve the scope, setup and handoff questions before selecting the simulation environment.
Simulation Live provides interactive guidance during design exploration. Creo Ansys Simulation focuses on more detailed refinement and validation studies. Choose the tool around the required physics, method and review evidence; the two offerings are not interchangeable licenses.
Consider it when the question requires the documented additional nonlinear contact, nonlinear material or combined structural and steady-state thermal capabilities. Establish why that behavior matters and confirm the exact supported study and entitlement for the selected release.
Bring a representative model, the design question, material information, loads, supports and the expected operating conditions. Include the person responsible for interpreting the analysis and agreeing the next action.
No. The model depends on its assumptions and numerical setup. Review mesh behavior, sensitivities, contacts and boundary conditions, and plan the appropriate physical evidence for the engineering decision.
The product datasheet, high-fidelity comparison guide and portfolio brochure on this page provide different levels of scope. Confirm current version, platform, package and licensing details with TriStar rather than treating an older reference as a purchase specification.
Do not assume it will. Confirm the supported handoff and inspect the definitions in the receiving study. Different methods, discretizations or contact assumptions can change the result even when the geometry is shared.
Tell us which behavior you need to investigate and what decision the result must support.
TriStar can help frame a representative evaluation, compare simulation options and clarify the required environment.
