ALM
- Requirements & risks
- Development work & test results
- Reviews & software release baselines
Bring requirements, risks, development work, and test evidence into one connected lifecycle. Know what changed, what needs another look, and which release the evidence belongs to.
Follow a requirement change
ALM joins the decisions and records across development. The relationships matter as much as the individual items.
Give requirements, risks, and acceptance criteria a shared context. Make ownership and review responsibilities visible before development moves ahead.
Relate development work to the requirements it addresses and the tests used to verify it. Keep the test case distinct from the result of a particular execution.
Retain review history and capture agreed baselines. When something changes, use those relationships to identify what needs another review.
What must the software do?
What evidence tests that intent?
Which version was reviewed?
A tighter response window affects more than a line of text. Follow the connected records to frame the next review.
Keep the previous wording, the proposed revision, and the reason for change in context. Identify who needs to review the new intent before treating it as agreed.
Has the requirement’s meaning changed, or only its wording?
Look at the risks and development items connected to the requirement. Ask whether the revised timing changes assumptions, dependencies, or the planned implementation.
Which linked records need an update or another review?
Review the test conditions and acceptance criteria against the revised requirement. A result from an earlier execution should retain the requirement version and software configuration it evaluated.
What needs to be revised, executed again, and linked to the result?
Capture the agreed records at the release milestone. Preserve the context needed to see which versions were reviewed and which evidence supports that particular release.
Can the team reconstruct the reviewed configuration and its evidence?
PTC Codebeamer brings requirements, risks, development workflows, and test management into a configurable ALM platform. Use connected records and review history to make the path from intent to evidence easier to follow.
Evaluate a platform around the evidence your team needs to create, connect, review, and retain.
Explore Codebeamer with TriStarView current PTC capabilitiesPlatform scope, deployment options, integrations, and licensing depend on the selected offering and configuration. Review current supplier details with TriStar.
Software evidence and product information answer different questions. A useful handoff keeps their relationships visible without losing the context of either record.
Which software release belongs with which product configuration?
Explore PLM & PDMDefine the records, link direction, access, and review responsibilities before choosing an integration. Availability and entitlement depend on the systems and deployment involved.
TriStar pairs ALM platform knowledge with consulting, configuration, integration, onboarding, and support. Start with the work your team needs to improve.
TriStar’s ALM consulting starts with your current tools, review process, and the handoffs that lose context.
Scope configuration and integration around the records, ownership, and relationships your team needs.
Discuss migration and onboarding needs, including record quality, review history, and a useful first workflow.
Bring training and ongoing support into the plan so the process can work for the people who use it.
Use the process and evidence to guide your scope.
ALM coordinates the people, processes, and tools used to plan, develop, verify, release, and maintain an application. Its value comes from connecting the work and the evidence across those activities.
ALM is the lifecycle practice. Codebeamer is PTC’s platform for requirements, risks, development workflows, testing, and traceability. Start with the process and evidence your team needs, then evaluate the platform scope.
A test case describes what will be tested and how. Evidence comes from a particular execution and its result, with the relevant requirement version and software configuration in context. Keeping these distinct helps a team understand what was actually verified.
Codebeamer supports several integration mechanisms. The appropriate connection depends on the source records, workflows, selected tools, deployment, and licensing. Define the handoff and ownership first, then evaluate the available options.
Traceability, review histories, baselines, and configurable templates can support a compliance process. They do not automatically certify a product or organization. Coverage and validation depend on your requirements, configuration, evidence, and review process.
Bring one meaningful requirement, review, or release handoff. TriStar can help discuss consulting, configuration and integration, migration and onboarding, training, and ongoing support around your ALM needs.
Bring us the review, release, or handoff that needs a clearer evidence trail.
We’ll help you frame the right ALM conversation.